Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.01 x 3.02 x 0.40 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 185 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than the ARCHOS 53 Titanium, having a general score of 82.5 against 45.6. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a lighter and thinner phone than the ARCHOS 53 Titanium. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a quite superior processing power than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a brighter display than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because it has a much better pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a little larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a very superior camera than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, although it has no slot for an SD memory card. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a very superior battery lifetime than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because it has a 68% bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 2 XL is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.