Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.01 x 3.02 x 0.40 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 185 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is way better than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, with a score of 80 against 45.6. Google Pixel 3's design is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than the ARCHOS 53 Titanium. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a more vivid display than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because it has a much greater display pixel density, a bit bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a quite superior performance than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more processing cores and 3,5 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, although it has no SD extension slot.
The Google Pixel 3 has a way better battery performance than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh. The Google Pixel 3 takes greater photos and videos than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Google Pixel 3 is a bit more expensive than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.