Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.01 x 3.02 x 0.40 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 185 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is way better than ARCHOS 53 Titanium's score of 45.6. Galaxy S9 is a thinner and lighter cellphone than the ARCHOS 53 Titanium. Galaxy S9 features an incredibly better display than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because it has way more pixels per screen inch, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy S9 features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ARCHOS 53 Titanium. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a superior processor than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S9 features a much better camera than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because it has a way higher video definition and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera. Galaxy S9 counts with a way better battery performance than ARCHOS 53 Titanium, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more money than the ARCHOS 53 Titanium, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.