Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.10 x 3.07 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6735P chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than the ARCHOS 55 Helium Plus, with an 83.7 score against 51.3. The LG V50 ThinQ is a a little heavier cellphone than the ARCHOS 55 Helium Plus, but they are equally thin. These phones include Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while ARCHOS 55 Helium Plus has Android 5.1, giving you a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with an extremely better CPU than ARCHOS 55 Helium Plus, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better screen than ARCHOS 55 Helium Plus, because it has a way higher display pixels density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a larger display.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior camera than ARCHOS 55 Helium Plus, because although it has a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than ARCHOS 55 Helium Plus, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 120 GB more internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much longer battery performance than ARCHOS 55 Helium Plus, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also cheaper, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.