Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.9 | 39.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 | Symbian 9.3 |
| -- | 2009-02-16 |
| 3.90 x 2.15 x 0.53 inches | 4.40 x 1.97 x 0.57 inches |
| 3.70 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| $ 605.00 | $ 360.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 154 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP850 chipset | -- |
| Single-Core 200 MHz processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor |
| 64 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.21 |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| -- | f/2.80 aperture |
| -- | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 4.84 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 2.7 | 3.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 280 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Nokia E75 is slightly better than Asus P320, with a 39.3 score against 35.9. The Nokia E75 comes with Symbian 9.3 operating system, while Asus P320 counts with Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 operating system. Although it's the best in this review, the Nokia E75 body is much heavier and a little bit thicker than Asus P320.
The Nokia E75 features a much better looking screen than Asus P320, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240 pixels, the Nokia E75 also counts with a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. Nokia E75 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Asus P320. Both have 1 cores.
The Nokia E75 features a much better camera than Asus P320, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher 3.2 megapixels resolution. Nokia E75 features as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Asus P320 one, although the Nokia E75 has no SD card slot.
The Asus P320 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Nokia E75, because it has 1100mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Nokia E75 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.