Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 65.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 4.0.3 | Android 5.1 |
| 2011-06-01 | 2015-07-28 |
| 5.04 x 2.57 x 0.36 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.48 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 306 GPU |
| 8.37 | 7.83 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2470mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 373 hours standby time 10.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G (2015) is slightly better than Asus PadFone, with a score of 65.2 against 59.3. Moto G (2015)'s design is noticeably newer than the Asus PadFone's, although it is somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Moto G (2015) has a more recent 5.1 version while Asus PadFone has Android 4.0.3 version, so it counts with some nice extra features.
The Moto G (2015) has a bit better looking display than Asus PadFone, because it has a larger screen, a bit more pixels per display inch and a higher 1280 x 720 resolution. The Asus PadFone has a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto G (2015), and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 32 GB, the Asus PadFone also has 16 GB more internal storage.
The Asus PadFone has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G (2015), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a larger number of cores. Motorola Moto G (2015) features a little bit better camera than Asus PadFone, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G (2015) also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
The Moto G (2015) features a way better battery life than Asus PadFone, because it has 2470mAh of battery capacity against 1520mAh.
The Motorola Moto G (2015) not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.