Compare phones
Asus PadFone mini
Dual SIMMotorola Moto G
8 GB| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 60.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 4.3 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2014-01-06 | 2013-11-13 |
| 4.90 x 2.42 x 0.44 inches | 5.11 x 2.59 x 0.46 inches |
| 4.09 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White | Black, Blue, Pink, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom Z2560 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset |
| Saltwell (Dual-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 544MP2 GPU | Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.06 | 3.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 4 | 4.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2070mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 350 hours standby time |
| 2.88 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Compass | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G has a general score of 60.3, which is a little bit better than Asus PadFone mini's 55.1 global score. Motorola Moto G's construction is just a little thicker and heavier than the Asus PadFone mini. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but Motorola Moto G has a more recent 5.0 version while Asus PadFone mini has Android 4.3.
The Moto G counts with a more vivid screen than Asus PadFone mini, because it has a much better resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger screen. The Moto G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Asus PadFone mini, and although they both have a 1 GB RAM, the Moto G also has an extra graphics processor and a greater number of cores (although they are slower).
Asus PadFone mini takes just a bit better videos and photos than Moto G, because it has a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot better 1920x1080 video definition. Asus PadFone mini has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Moto G, and although they both have equal 8 GB internal memory, the Asus PadFone mini also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 64 GB.
Moto G features a very superior battery performance than Asus PadFone mini, because it has a 2070mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Moto G is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.