Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 4.0 |
| 2014-01-06 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.67 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 417 hours standby time 30 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is just a bit better than the Asus PadFone S, having a global score of 71.5 against 65. The Galaxy S III Cricket is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Asus PadFone S. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S III Cricket has the previous 4.0 version and Asus PadFone S has Android 4.4.
Asus PadFone S counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a better display pixels density, a much better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little larger display. Asus PadFone S counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, and they both have 2 GB of RAM, the Asus PadFone S also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket captures a bit better photographs and videos than Asus PadFone S, although it has a way worse 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, a lot less megapixels back-facing camera and a much tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos. The Galaxy S III Cricket has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Asus PadFone S, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 64 GB, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has 32 GB internal storage capacity.
Asus PadFone S has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.