Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-01-06 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 2300 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 417 hours standby time 30 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is a lot better than Asus PadFone X's general score of 65. Google Pixel 5's construction is noticeably newer and notably thinner than the Asus PadFone X's, but it's a little heavier. Asus PadFone X has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Google Pixel 5 has a little bit better performance than Asus PadFone X, because it has more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 5 has a much greater memory for games and applications than Asus PadFone X, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 5 has a superior battery life than Asus PadFone X, because it has a 77% larger battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 takes greater videos and photos than Asus PadFone X, because although it has a worse resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography in low light environments.
The Google Pixel 5 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Asus PadFone X, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.