Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.80 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.40 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Matte White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2448 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 18 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 11.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a overall score of 94 against 77.8. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate is a way older, just a bit heavier and much thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate features a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate also has a greater amount of RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate, because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a just a little greater pixel density, a bigger display and much more brightness. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate's one, they have equal 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro's camera is very similar to the camera in Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate, because although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a worse video definition and a lot less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.