Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Phantom Black and Rebel Grey | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is much better than Moto G Power, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 76.1. Although Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Moto G Power, it's a little thinner and newer. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a newer 14 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a much better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
Moto G Power features a very superior processor than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a little longer battery life than Moto G Power, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 50 MP resolution, a way higher video resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.