Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-01-08 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Phantom Black and Rebel Grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is better than the Moto Z Force, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 75.8. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has the older 14 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro's body is way newer than the Moto Z Force's, although it's extremely heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a much better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a lot lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Moto Z Force features a much better performing processor than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster). The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a much longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.