Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-01-08 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Phantom Black and Rebel Grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a overall score of 84.2 against 77.4. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro design is way newer, but notably thicker and way heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a slightly better looking display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a lot worse count of pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bigger display.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much better performance than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger camera aperture and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.