Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-01-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Phantom Black and Rebel Grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 387 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has an overall score of 84.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is a way newer cellphone, and it's also way thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much more powerful processor than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much worse display density, it also counts with a way larger screen.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.