Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black Glare | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone II is better than HTC One M9, having an 88 score against 77.7. The Asus ROG Phone II is a noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner phone than HTC One M9, although it is also way heavier. HTC One M9 features just a bit better looking screen than Asus ROG Phone II, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Asus ROG Phone II, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits processor. The Asus ROG Phone II has a much better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Asus ROG Phone II also has a back camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Asus ROG Phone II counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Asus ROG Phone II has a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.