Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HTC |
| 2019-09-04 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black Glare | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone II has a global score of 88, which is better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. Although Asus ROG Phone II is newer than the HTC U Ultra, it's noticeably heavier and thicker. The Asus ROG Phone II features a better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and more processing cores.
HTC U Ultra features a display that's just as good as the Asus ROG Phone II one, because although the HTC U Ultra has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Asus ROG Phone II has a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Asus ROG Phone II also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Asus ROG Phone II has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Asus ROG Phone II counts with a superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.