Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| 2019-09-04 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black Glare | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone II has a general score of 88, which is much better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's overall score of 76.4. Asus ROG Phone II is a way newer phone than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it is noticeably thicker and extremely heavier. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a slightly better looking display than Asus ROG Phone II, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel density.
Asus ROG Phone II counts with just a little better processing power than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 8 GB more RAM. The Asus ROG Phone II counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Asus ROG Phone II features a way better battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh. The Asus ROG Phone II counts with a superior camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Asus ROG Phone II also has a much better resolution back-facing camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.