Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black Glare | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone II has a general score of 88, which is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Even when the Asus ROG Phone II and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only a couple of months difference, the Asus ROG Phone II is notably thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid display than Asus ROG Phone II, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of screen. Asus ROG Phone II has much more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Asus ROG Phone II counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Asus ROG Phone II also has a higher amount of RAM. The Asus ROG Phone II features longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Asus ROG Phone II features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, it also counts with a way better video definition, a camera with much more mega pixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.