Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Asus ROG Phone's global score of 77.1. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a little bit heavier than Asus ROG Phone, it's notably thinner and also way newer. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better display than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a just a bit higher screen density, a much bigger display, a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution and much more brightness.
Asus ROG Phone features a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Asus ROG Phone one, both have equal internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much better video definition and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Asus ROG Phone, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Asus ROG Phone. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some dollars and get the Asus ROG Phone, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.