Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-03-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.90 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue | Black and Blue |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, getting a 77.9 score against 76.1. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has Android 14 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. Motorola DROID Turbo's construction is way lighter than the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it is notably thicker and was released many years before.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a much greater performance than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little more vivid display than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a larger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 41% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.