Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.62 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe's 77.5 score. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is incredibly heavier than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, it's much thinner and incredibly newer. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better display than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a much bigger display and a just a bit greater pixel density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe features a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser processing cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a way higher video definition, a way better resolution camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a 90% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.