Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-07-12 | 2019-09-04 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's 73.3 score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is notably newer and somewhat lighter than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's, but it is also somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit sharper display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite higher screen pixel density. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A90 5G captures much better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A90 5G also has faster video frame rate and a much more MP back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.