Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2024-04-03 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.86 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's global score of 73.3. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a way newer phone, and it's also just a little lighter and extremely thinner than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has a bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a higher pixel quantity in each display inch. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has a lot better video definition, a lot better resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features superior battery life than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.