Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-02-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, getting a 77.9 score against 76.2. Even though the Motorola DROID Turbo is a better phone than the Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, we must highlight that it is also an extremely older, just a bit heavier and incredibly thicker phone. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better display than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has lower 24 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features improved battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.