Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's 75.5 score. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo's design is a lot older, a little heavier and way thicker than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the previous 4.4.4 version while Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit superior CPU than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo captures clearer videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has slower 24 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better battery duration than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.