Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A12 has a global score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's score of 75.5. The Samsung Galaxy A12 body is a lot newer than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A12 has an older 10 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Asus ZenFone 4 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1080 x 1920px resolution.
The Galaxy A12 takes a bit better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A12, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a way better battery duration than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 39% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.