Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 599.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro's 75.5 score. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, it's noticeably thinner and also much newer. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Asus ZenFone 4 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a bit greater pixels density, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a much larger screen. The Asus ZenFone 4 Pro features a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger camera sensor and a camera with a much higher resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery life than Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, because it has a 58% larger battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Asus ZenFone 4 Pro, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.