Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-30 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Green and White | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 4's global score of 74.2. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is extremely heavier than Asus ZenFone 4, it's way thinner and also extremely newer. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while Asus ZenFone 4 has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Asus ZenFone 4 features a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Asus ZenFone 4, because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, much more screen brightness, a bit more pixels per display inch and a lot larger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Asus ZenFone 4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Asus ZenFone 4, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 4, because it has a way more mega pixels back camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture for better low light images and video.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Asus ZenFone 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Asus ZenFone 4. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Asus ZenFone 4, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.