Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), having a 77.8 score against 74.5. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is extremely heavier than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), it's a lot thinner and incredibly newer. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL) has Android 9.0 Pie.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better display than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a bigger display, a lot brighter screen and a quite higher pixel number in each display inch. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL) has a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with much more megapixels and a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery performance than Asus ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.