Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-11 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is much better than the Asus ZenFone 5Q's score of 72.6. The Galaxy C9 Pro body is thinner than Asus ZenFone 5Q, although it's somewhat heavier and was released only 16 months before. The Asus ZenFone 5Q has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q features a bit sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also has a little bit better display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The Asus ZenFone 5Q captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also counts with a way better video resolution.
The Asus ZenFone 5Q counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Asus ZenFone 5Q also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy C9 Pro features longer battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.