Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.32 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 5Q's global score of 72.6. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is newer and much thinner than Asus ZenFone 5Q's, but it is also heavier. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a really bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Asus ZenFone 5Q has an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery life than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a 73 percent bigger battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Asus ZenFone 5Q, because it has a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a way larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a way better video resolution.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Asus ZenFone 5Q, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Asus ZenFone 5Q. So if you want that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Asus ZenFone 5Q, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.