Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super IPS+ LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has a general score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone 5z's general score of 75.3. Although Motorola Droid Turbo is a better cellphone than the Asus ZenFone 5z, we must tell that it is also older, incredibly thicker and a little bit heavier. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a brighter screen than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater display density.
Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low light environments, they both have the same video definition.
The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with better battery performance than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.