Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super IPS+ LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone 5z, having a general score of 77.9 against 75.3. Even being the best in this comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo design is noticeably older, just a little heavier and notably thicker than the Asus ZenFone 5z. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a brighter display than Asus ZenFone 5z, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Asus ZenFone 5z features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with better battery performance than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in low-light situations and lower 24 fps video frame rates, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.