Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-06-13 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | TFT |
| 402 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is better than Asus ZenFone 5z, having an 84.7 score against 75.3. Galaxy A32's body is a lot newer than Asus ZenFone 5z's, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker. The Asus ZenFone 5z counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2246 resolution and a higher pixel count per inch in the screen.
Asus ZenFone 5z has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone 5z features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A32 features a way better battery life than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A32 features a very superior camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.