Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-13 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 499.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 5z, having an 81 score against 75.3. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is just a little thinner than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it is somewhat heavier and was released just a little over a year before. The Asus ZenFone 5z features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit better screen pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2246 resolution.
The Asus ZenFone 5z has a bit better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 5z also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a much better camera than Asus ZenFone 5z, although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality.
The Asus ZenFone 5z features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy C9 Pro has better battery life than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.