Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-13 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone 5z, with a score of 77.8 against 75.3. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is notably newer and much thinner than Asus ZenFone 5z's, although it's extremely heavier. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger display, way more brightness and a little bit higher pixels density.
Asus ZenFone 5z has a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Asus ZenFone 5z features a greater memory to install games and applications than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery performance than Asus ZenFone 5z, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Asus ZenFone 5z, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Asus ZenFone 5z. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some money and buy the Asus ZenFone 5z, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.