Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.50 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.11 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black and Pastel white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 7 is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 83.9 against 77.8. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Asus ZenFone 7 has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Even being the best in our current comparison, Asus ZenFone 7's body is way older, noticeably thicker and just a little bit heavier than vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 7, because it has a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a larger screen, much more brightness and a little greater pixel count per inch in the screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Asus ZenFone 7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
Asus ZenFone 7 counts with a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 7, because although it has a lot worse 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lower 7680x4320 video definition, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than Asus ZenFone 7, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.