Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| 2017-08-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Asus ZenFone AR, with a score of 83.8 against 77.4. The Galaxy A50 design is newer, just a little lighter and thinner than the Asus ZenFone AR. The Asus ZenFone AR counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Asus ZenFone AR features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture and a lower 23 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Asus ZenFone AR counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone AR also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features better battery duration than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.