Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-08-03 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the Asus ZenFone AR, having a general score of 80.1 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is much newer than the Asus ZenFone AR's, although it is way thicker and a lot heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a bit greater pixels density. Asus ZenFone AR counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way higher 23 megapixels resolution camera.
Asus ZenFone AR features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery performance than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.