Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone AR, getting a overall score of 81 against 77.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is noticeably newer than Asus ZenFone AR, it is thicker and much heavier. Asus ZenFone AR counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Asus ZenFone AR has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone AR counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a less mega pixels camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher video resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.