Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-03 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is better than the Asus ZenFone AR's score of 77.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is way newer and noticeably thinner than Asus ZenFone AR's, but it's also incredibly heavier. The Asus ZenFone AR has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display.
Asus ZenFone AR counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
The Asus ZenFone AR has a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has superior battery life than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.