Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s 73.1 overall score. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is just a bit lighter than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), although it is thicker and was released 4 years before. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has older 4.4.4 version while Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit faster processor than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo takes a bit better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same 24 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a back camera with a lot better 20.7 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.