Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-05-03 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 402 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), having a global score of 84.7 against 73.1. Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Galaxy A32 body is a lot newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1).
The Galaxy A32 counts with a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a better screen density.
The Galaxy A32 shoots much better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rate, a much more MP back facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32's battery duration is just as good as the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.