Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), with a overall score of 77.8 against 73.1. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is a lot newer and a lot thinner, but heavier than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version while Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has much more display brightness, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a much bigger display and a bit more pixels per screen inch. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage to install applications and games than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some money and get the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.