| Global Score | |
| 31.7 | 34.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Benq | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Professional 2003 SE | -- |
| -- | 2014-02-24 |
| 4.72 x 2.36 x 0.78 inches | 4.58 x 1.98 x 0.52 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 2.95 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow |
| $ 619.00 | $ 145.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | LCD |
| -- | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.7 | 6 |
| Intel PXA270 (Single-Core 416 MHz) processor | processor |
| 64 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 6.39 | 5.76 |
| MMC, SD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor |
| -- | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 5.72 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.6 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 100 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 696 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Nokia 220 is a bit better than the BenQ P50, having a 34.9 score against 31.7. Nokia 220 is a incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner device than the BenQ P50. The BenQ P50 has a quite better hardware performance than Nokia 220, because it has a greater number of cores. Nokia 220 has an incredibly better looking display than BenQ P50. They have exactly the same resolution of 320 x 240.
The Nokia 220 shoots much better photos and videos than BenQ P50, because it has a lot higher 2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. Nokia 220 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than BenQ P50. The Nokia 220 features a superior battery lifetime than BenQ P50.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Nokia 220 is also by far the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.