Search


Compare phones

Nokia 220

Dual SIM
Global Score
31.734.9
Basic Information
BenqNokia
Windows Mobile Professional 2003 SE--
--2014-02-24
4.72 x 2.36 x 0.78 inches4.58 x 1.98 x 0.52 inches
5.29 ounces2.95 ounces
--Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow
$ 619.00$ 145.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.76
Intel PXA270 (Single-Core 416 MHz) processor processor
64 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
6.395.76
MMC, SD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.32
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--0.2 inches (1/5") sensor
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.515.72
Networks
Wi-Fi--
GPRS and GSMGPRS and GSM
SIMSIM, Dual SIM
2.60.2
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
100 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
696 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
1.362.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1Bluetooth 3.0
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Nokia 220 is a bit better than the BenQ P50, having a 34.9 score against 31.7. Nokia 220 is a incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner device than the BenQ P50. The BenQ P50 has a quite better hardware performance than Nokia 220, because it has a greater number of cores. Nokia 220 has an incredibly better looking display than BenQ P50. They have exactly the same resolution of 320 x 240.

The Nokia 220 shoots much better photos and videos than BenQ P50, because it has a lot higher 2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. Nokia 220 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than BenQ P50. The Nokia 220 features a superior battery lifetime than BenQ P50.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Nokia 220 is also by far the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.