Search


Compare phones

Global Score
28.631.3
Basic Information
BENQ SiemensSony
2006-03-082005-10-17
4.09 x 1.83 x 0.69 inches4.30 x 1.90 x 0.90 inches
3.17 ounces5.20 ounces
$ 795.00$ 249.00
132 x 176 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.13.1
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
23,55 MB internal memory481,28 MB internal memory
RS-MMC (up to 128 GB) external memory slotMemory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Duo external memory slot
2.621.1
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.84
EDGE and GSMUMTS, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.2
Battery Life
820mAh Li-Ion Battery900mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
370 hours standby time
8.2 hours talk time
2.322.4
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0
--Infra-red port

Comparison review

Sony Ericsson W900 is slightly better than the Benq-Siemens C81, having a overall score of 31.3 against 28.6. Despite being the best device we compare here, we must note that it is also a notably heavier and a lot thicker device. Sony Ericsson W900 counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the processing unit in Benq-Siemens C81, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.

The Benq-Siemens C81 and the Sony Ericsson W900 have very similar displays, although the Sony Ericsson W900 also has a way better 320 x 240 pixels resolution. Sony Ericsson W900 has a bit better camera than Benq-Siemens C81, because it has a back facing camera with much more megapixels. The Benq-Siemens C81 features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Sony Ericsson W900, although it has only 23,55 MB internal memory capacity.

Sony Ericsson W900 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Benq-Siemens C81, because it has a 10% larger battery size.

Sony Ericsson W900 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.