Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.79 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 18.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3410mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a score of 76.2, which is a bit better than BlackBerry Priv's 69.4 general score. The nubia Red Magic 5S design is much newer than the BlackBerry Priv's, but it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a bit better performance than BlackBerry Priv, because it has 5 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The BlackBerry Priv has just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. BlackBerry Priv has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots greater pictures and videos than BlackBerry Priv, because it has a bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations, a lot more mega pixels camera and a way better 7680x4320 video quality. Nubia Red Magic 5S features better battery performance than BlackBerry Priv, because it has a 32% larger battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.