Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.79 x 3.04 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 18.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3410mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than BlackBerry Priv, having a global score of 81.1 against 69.7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is a little heavier but just a bit thinner than BlackBerry Priv. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has newer 10 version while BlackBerry Priv has Android 5.1 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
The BlackBerry Priv has a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per display inch. The BlackBerry Priv has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a quite better performance than BlackBerry Priv, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better camera than BlackBerry Priv, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a larger aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much longer battery life than BlackBerry Priv, because it has a 47% bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs a little more money than BlackBerry Priv, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.