Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is better than Blackview BL6000 Pro's 71.8 general score. Google Pixel 2 is a notably lighter and a lot thinner cellphone than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. Blackview BL6000 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Blackview BL6000 Pro also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Blackview BL6000 Pro has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal memory. The Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 96% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.