Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Blackview BL6000 Pro, with a score of 83.7 against 71.8. Both devices we are comparing have the same Android 10 operating system. LG V50 ThinQ's design is extremely lighter and incredibly thinner than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better looking display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Blackview BL6000 Pro has better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5280mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a much less mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.